| Author |
Message |
|
|
 |
Mon Feb 01, 2010 7:08 pm  |
| I'm probably the only person in the universe who hated the Clarisonic. It made my skin look rough. I have a galvanic gadget that does a much better job of deep cleaning than the clarisonic did for me. In fact, I think the galvanic gadget could be my all-time favorite, even beating out the LED. I need to get back to using it more often. My skin looks so smooth when I finish. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tue Feb 02, 2010 10:24 am |
This device also piqued my interest for product penetration since I've decided not to go the dermaroller route (at least for now).
Have you found an increase in skin firmness & thickness since using it? TIA |
|
|
|
|
|
Tue Feb 02, 2010 11:09 am |
DM and brierrose,
I haven't used it for product penetration at all. I'm using it with positive and negative gels for cleansing and it's wonderful for that. Because I have somewhat sensitive skin, I've been afraid to push anything into my skin. I really don't use it enough to have seen long term firming from it, but the short term firming is great - not only immediately afterwards but the next day as well. I've only been using it once a week, but I've decided to alternate days with the LED now. |
|
|
|
|
|
Tue Feb 02, 2010 6:49 pm |
| DM, I use the Clarisonic and really enjoy it.Thats what I meant when I said I was lazy and thought it clean better. |
|
|
|
|
| Thu Feb 20, 2025 8:08 pm |
If this is your first visit to the EDS Forums please take the time to register. Registration is required for you to post on the forums. Registration will also give you the ability to track messages of interest, send private messages to other users, participate in Gift Certificates draws and enjoy automatic discounts for shopping at our online store. Registration is free and takes just a few seconds to complete.
Click Here to join our community.
If you are already a registered member on the forums, please login to gain full access to the site. |
|
 |
|
