| Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Sun Jun 24, 2007 5:07 pm  |
Hi, saw this on the Cellex-C website. Has anyone heard or used this new product? Thanks,
www.cellex-c.com |
|
|
|
|
|
Sun Jun 24, 2007 6:22 pm |
| Wow, it's certainly not cheap, 1oz for $175 and 4oz for $525. I'll wait until I see the results on Mr."C", or in this case J.J's. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mon Jun 25, 2007 5:43 am |
Ok...I hate that site...it's a little too glossy and pretentious for my taste. The split picture of the lady that used it on only half her face, is very UNimpressive...and why is she wearing big sunglasses? I would like to see what her eyes looked like. Personally I think the cost is absurd, when you can buy CP's, Vit C and Retin A for so much less and the results are great! My 2 cents.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:16 am |
| I agree that the split photo was unimpressive. I had to look closely to see which side she'd treated. Some of the other before after photos showed quite a change though. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:44 pm |
Joan Collins was just on one of those entertainment shows (Access Hollywood, Entertainment Tonight, all the same...) advertising this product, she said it makes her face so tight & smooth, I'm thinking she's had a little more help than this serum...  |
_________________
46 - dry, - I'm on a strict "No Buy" - however, a coupon code & free shipping can quickly change that... |
|
|
|
|
Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:56 pm |
| mountaingirl wrote: |
| Ok...I hate that site...it's a little too glossy and pretentious for my taste. The split picture of the lady that used it on only half her face, is very UNimpressive...and why is she wearing big sunglasses? I would like to see what her eyes looked like. Personally I think the cost is absurd, when you can buy CP's, Vit C and Retin A for so much less and the results are great! My 2 cents. |
I guess the explanation was that her eyes were not treated yet. I hope they will keep posting the progress. I actually do prefer they show the "now" picture that both sides are not all that different. If 6 months later, there are more noticeable difference, then I will be more likely to shell out my hard earned money on this portion. They did have a very successful precedent of Mr.C who did the half face experiment and proven to be quite convincing living proof. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:57 pm |
| CrazyForClooney wrote: |
| Joan Collins was just on one of those entertainment shows (Access Hollywood, Entertainment Tonight, all the same...) advertising this product, she said it makes her face so tight & smooth, I'm thinking she's had a little more help than this serum... |
Imo, A lot of help |
_________________
The best way to locate your cat is to open a can of food. |
|
|
|
|
Mon Jun 25, 2007 5:05 pm |
| iaimei wrote: |
| I guess the explanation was that her eyes were not treated yet. |
Yes, there's a comment saying that her eye area and forehead are not yet treated.
| iaimei wrote: |
| They did have a very successful precedent of Mr.C who did the half face experiment and proven to be quite convincing living proof. |
I thought about him too. I found his pictures to be a much better ad  |
|
|
|
|
|
Mon Jun 25, 2007 5:07 pm |
| What's up with the price. People who can afford that in my opinion would opt for a mini face lift and a bunch of other stuff instead of waiting 8 weeks to get minimal results. How many ounces would you need to use for 8 weeks if you covered your face and neck twice a day? |
_________________
The best way to locate your cat is to open a can of food. |
|
|
|
|
Mon Jun 25, 2007 5:30 pm |
| Frodo wrote: |
| What's up with the price. People who can afford that in my opinion would opt for a mini face lift and a bunch of other stuff instead of waiting 8 weeks to get minimal results. How many ounces would you need to use for 8 weeks if you covered your face and neck twice a day? |
Very good point. This is definitely out of my price range for now. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:02 pm |
Given the price is so high, you would think they would have tested/treated longer, so that they would have had SPECTACULAR results to promote the product. I think they are marketing too early, which turns me off!! 
It shows they are really not ready to be making promises... they might not be able to deliver. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:54 pm |
| luvyourskin wrote: |
Given the price is so high, you would think they would have tested/treated longer, so that they would have had SPECTACULAR results to promote the product. I think they are marketing too early, which turns me off!!
It shows they are really not ready to be making promises... they might not be able to deliver. |
That's why they are probably putting it on the market now so as to maybe make enough money to at least pay for their R&D. Just a thought. |
_________________
The best way to locate your cat is to open a can of food. |
|
lerman3
New Member
 
Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 1
|
|
|
Fri May 02, 2008 11:52 am |
| I have been using the ageless 15 product by cellex c for about a month already and I already see results even though the literature says to use it for at least 6 weeks. Its great. You still need to use a moisturizer with it, but I don't mind. I recommend this product. My skin is already noticeably firmer. |
|
|
|
|
|
Wed May 20, 2009 5:42 am |
I, too, saw an article about Joan Collins promoting this product. (she suggests that it would help Camilla Parker-Bowles )
That being said, I began using the Cellex C brand when they first came on the scene (10 (?) years ago) and I then continued with it for years.
This Ageless 15 product is intriguing - I would be interested in knowing if anyone is using it at the present time. Does anyone who understands ingredients know why they might be in this item & if they're any good? I have being using a number of the ZO Skin Health things (which are also very expensive) & I would hesitate on repurchasing most of those items because I just don't care for them. Price makes me hesitate (somewhat) but if the outcome is what they advertise then it could be worth it. Maybe.
http://www.essentialdayspa.com/cellex-c-ageless-15-skin-p_7938.htm |
_________________
62 yrs old, normal skin, sagging is becoming more aggresive (YIKES!), additives preferred in skin care. Malignant melanoma 2004. |
|
|
|
|
Wed May 20, 2009 8:48 am |
| I just checked the cellex site, and JJ's photo hasn't been updated in 2 years. Not a good sign. |
|
|
|
|
|
Wed May 20, 2009 7:41 pm |
| Definitely not a good sign and where is lerman3 who liked it so much? Here today and gone tomorrow for so much of this stuff - especially the expensive ones. |
_________________
Enjoying dermalogica with my ASG and Pico toner ** Disclosure: I was a participant without remuneration in promotional videos for Ageless Secret Gold and the Neurotris Pico Emmy event. |
|
|
|
|
Thu May 21, 2009 4:33 am |
| sister sweets wrote: |
| Definitely not a good sign and where is lerman3 who liked it so much? Here today and gone tomorrow for so much of this stuff - especially the expensive ones. |
Good point. |
_________________
62 yrs old, normal skin, sagging is becoming more aggresive (YIKES!), additives preferred in skin care. Malignant melanoma 2004. |
|
|
|
|
Sun Mar 14, 2010 1:05 pm |
| I agree. it is too expensive |
|
|
|
|
| Wed Feb 05, 2025 9:00 am |
If this is your first visit to the EDS Forums please take the time to register. Registration is required for you to post on the forums. Registration will also give you the ability to track messages of interest, send private messages to other users, participate in Gift Certificates draws and enjoy automatic discounts for shopping at our online store. Registration is free and takes just a few seconds to complete.
Click Here to join our community.
If you are already a registered member on the forums, please login to gain full access to the site. |
|
 |
|
