| Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Mon Aug 26, 2013 3:46 pm  |
Which would you guys buy first if the main objective is to tighten/firm skin and help slow down further deterioration? I've read and read and read, and some say Micro-current is more effective, others say the Ultrasound/LED red light combo is the most effective.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Tue Aug 27, 2013 2:17 am |
The basic premise of versus is the red herring preventing you from finding an answer.
As with health, skincare is best approached with an awareness that a multi pronged open minded approach invariably provides the best results. |
|
|
|
|
|
Tue Aug 27, 2013 5:20 am |
To slow down further deterioration, I would say needling is the best choice.
Microcurrent doesn't have any real proof behind it from a tightening/firming standpoint and ultrasound is only proven to help increase product penetration via cavitation.
That said, I own a cheapie microcurrent ($14) which I like, and just bought a Sqoom ultrasound knockoff ($260) As Catski said, it takes a multi pronged approach, unfortunately. |
_________________
No longer answering PM's due to numerous weird messages. |
|
|
|
|
Tue Aug 27, 2013 7:47 am |
| Bethany, what kind of Sqoom knockoff did you buy? |
_________________
48 years old. Very acne prone. Staples: Retin-A/Tazorac and C serum. |
|
|
|
|
Tue Aug 27, 2013 8:22 am |
| doodles wrote: |
| Bethany, what kind of Sqoom knockoff did you buy? |
A Merbe from eBay. It appears to be identical to the Sqoom M1 model. |
_________________
No longer answering PM's due to numerous weird messages. |
|
|
|
|
Tue Aug 27, 2013 9:34 am |
Needling?! I can see why many people just give up. 
Re. product penetration via ultrasound, that could be a good thing if there are skin actives that actually do work to correct aging changes. But I am not really aware of any, tried Skin Biology peptides for a year and they did nothing for me. I do know the vit c serum works topically, I wonder if deeper penetration via LED and ultrasound would help more with collagen production.
Bethany, I read on one of the threads you've had success treating Marionette Lines with your microcurrent, have the results lasted provided you keep using it?
Catski, I am planning to get both, just pondering which to start with. |
|
|
|
|
|
Tue Aug 27, 2013 10:36 am |
| tompet wrote: |
Bethany, I read on one of the threads you've had success treating Marionette Lines with your microcurrent, have the results lasted provided you keep using it?
|
They have lasted as long as I kept using it, but the improvement is pretty minimal. But I'll take any help I can get!
FYI that the top actives for skin are Vit A and C. |
_________________
No longer answering PM's due to numerous weird messages. |
|
|
|
|
Tue Aug 27, 2013 11:07 am |
Oh, forgot about vit A. Probably because I can't use retinoids, they give me an itchy rash.
Re. the marionette lines, I feel the same way. Any improvement would be cause for celebration. |
|
|
|
|
| Fri Nov 29, 2024 2:34 am |
If this is your first visit to the EDS Forums please take the time to register. Registration is required for you to post on the forums. Registration will also give you the ability to track messages of interest, send private messages to other users, participate in Gift Certificates draws and enjoy automatic discounts for shopping at our online store. Registration is free and takes just a few seconds to complete.
Click Here to join our community.
If you are already a registered member on the forums, please login to gain full access to the site. |
|
 |
|
