| Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Tue Aug 28, 2018 6:15 pm  |
I have a nuface. While I haven't had omg results, I do see a difference in my jaw line and overall tautness. Not much help for forehead lines or 11's sadly.
Anyway, I just ran across a blog entry from an esthetician who is well known here comparing the Nuface to the Clareblend Mini. She states that the Nuface is a galvanic device and that the Mini is basically superior for that reason. She also sells the Clareblend so there's that...
I really can't afford another microcurrent device. I don't like the fact that the clareblend is non-returnable unless it's defective.
That being said, if the Nuface is actually not microcurrent, I'm just wasting time.
Input anyone? |
|
|
|
|
 |
Wed Aug 29, 2018 12:03 am |
| I was surprised to read that too. But if you’re seeing results with the nuface then you’re not completely wasting your time |
|
|
|
|
|
Wed Aug 29, 2018 10:27 am |
Nuface is using micro currents. They have it stated on their website, they are FDA approved and clinically tested (https://www.mynuface.com/pages/clinically-tested-fda-cleared). That being said, I couldn't find data how many participants so... As usual with beauty devices, accept with a pinch of salt.
A lot of people sing praises about Clareblend mini. I didn't find any link about it on Clareblend website (http://clareblend.info/), only links I found were on sites of estheticians that are affiliated. No clinical studies at all... For me, those are not promising signs.
I would stick with Nuface since you have it (and the company offers returns). ATP production takes time to happen, several months.
I found that for me it helps with lymphatic drainage (eyes, double chin) and where are muscles positioned (cheeks), not really wrinkles...
Good luck!
| Lorraineg57 wrote: |
I have a nuface. While I haven't had omg results, I do see a difference in my jaw line and overall tautness. Not much help for forehead lines or 11's sadly.
Anyway, I just ran across a blog entry from an esthetician who is well known here comparing the Nuface to the Clareblend Mini. She states that the Nuface is a galvanic device and that the Mini is basically superior for that reason. She also sells the Clareblend so there's that...
I really can't afford another microcurrent device. I don't like the fact that the clareblend is non-returnable unless it's defective.
That being said, if the Nuface is actually not microcurrent, I'm just wasting time.
Input anyone? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wed Aug 29, 2018 5:04 pm |
I know that the above mentioned esthetician has a video using the wands and shows precise placement techniques. On the video where she uses the clareblend, she just glides it all over her face, without much rhyme or reason, which confuses me. The timing with the clareblend is 10 seconds per glide or placement. I'm wondering if longer glides or hold times would yield better results with the nuface. Also maybe more precise placement?
Thanks for the response |
|
|
|
|
|
Wed Aug 29, 2018 5:13 pm |
| Thanks Lizzie! |
|
|
|
|
| Mon Jan 06, 2025 10:13 am |
If this is your first visit to the EDS Forums please take the time to register. Registration is required for you to post on the forums. Registration will also give you the ability to track messages of interest, send private messages to other users, participate in Gift Certificates draws and enjoy automatic discounts for shopping at our online store. Registration is free and takes just a few seconds to complete.
Click Here to join our community.
If you are already a registered member on the forums, please login to gain full access to the site. |
|
 |
|
