| Author |
Message |
|
|
 |
Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:09 am  |
BOOTS SOLTAN 50+ ANTI-AGEING SUN DEFENCE CREAM
This is really more of a partial review, as because my skin is very pale, I avoid the sun when at all possible. So I can't really give good advice on whether it's effective at protecting your skin from the sun.
However, it has been given 5 stars on the UVA protection rating system, with a photostable SPF of 50+.
I have been using Clarins UV40 for facial sun protection during the cooler months because of its lightness and, as avalange so eloquently puts it, cosmetic elegance. Worrying that the Clarins won't be enough for summer, I decided to experiment a little with other brands, and this is the best I've yet tried.
Soltan is Boots' own brand of suncare. It's very reasonably priced and comes in a 50ml tube.
The blurb states that, as well as "photostable UVA & UVB filters" and "five star ultra protection against UVA", this also contains a "patented antioxidant complex and Optisol to reduce radical damage to the skin."
It's also supposed to provide the following benefits: "Light, non-greasy formula helps protect against long term skin damage - Water resistant - Non pore-blocking - Dermatologically tested - Can be used under make-up - Adds a hint of radiance."
The directions tell you to apply 15 mins before sun exposure, then re-apply 15 mins later, followed by subsequent 1 to 2 hourly applications.
Ingredients:
aqua, C12-15 alkyl benzoate, glycerin, octocrylene, butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane, isotridecyl salicylate, isononyl isononanoate, C-18-36 acid glycol ester, polyglyceryl-3, methylglucose distearate, polysilicone-15, methylene bis-benzotriazoyl, tetromethylbutylphenol, bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol, methoxyphenyl triazine, butyrospermum parkii butter, dimethicone, titanium dioxide, diethylhexyl butamido triazone, sorbitan stearate, phenoxyethanol, cetyl alcohol, polysorbate 20, mica, decyl glucoside, tocopheryl acetate, parfum, xanthan gum, acrylates/vinyl isodecanoate, crosspolymer, sodium ascorbyl phosphate, vitis vinifera, sucrose cocoate, dimethyl oxazolidine, glycol, propylene glycol, panax ginseng, manganese dioxide, aminomethyl propanol
Verdict:
As I said earlier, I'm not likely to give this a full workout until I go to Ontario later this year, so I can't vouch for how this stuff works in really hot, sunny climes. However, it's been absolutely fine so far in reasonably sunny (with cloudy/rainy intervals) England.
Texture-wise, this feels like quite a rich cream, but spreads nicely and easily on the skin. Whilst it doesn't completely absorb, it doesn't feel anywhere near as greasy, sticky or heavy as other creamy sunscreens. It's not completely shine-free, but the initial shine does wear off considerably after a little while, leaving what I feel to be an acceptable "glow". In fact, it really doesn't look bad at all on bare skin. You may, though, want to dust some powder on top if you prefer a more matte look. There was no discernible white cast whatsoever, but, as I wrote earlier, my skin is very pale.
My make-up goes on fine over the top - although I do use a spray foundation (SK II Airtouch), rather than MMU or cream/liquid.
I'd say that, despite the seemingly rich texture, the lovely avalange herself might agree with me that this is quite a cosmetically elegant product.
Unless I find anything superior, I reckon I'll probably be sticking to this over the summer months.
Now I'm just waiting for someone more knowledgeable than myself to tell me that the ingredients list is horrendous, and was probably created by all the devils in Hell. (Keeping my fingers crossed that there's nothing too nasty in there - but really looking forward to hearing your views on whether it's a goodie or a baddie, recipe-wise.) |
|
|
|
|
|
Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:26 am |
| I bought this during my recent holiday in England after reading about it in another forum. It has a good protective formulation that includes avobenzone stabilized by octocrylene as well as Tinosorb M and S. For the price, it's fantastic value and the UVA protection is estimated to be at least as good as Avene sunscreens. I also found it to be less heavy in texture than the Avene products. Only drawback is that you probably shouldn't use it under mineral make up because the minerals could reduce the effect of the avobenzone. In any case, you should also wait about 20 minutes before applying any make up. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sun Jun 10, 2007 12:02 am |
You need to get the latest version of the Avene emulsion formulas. They have *dramatically* improved.
You must check that the pack says **ultra-fluide**. There seems to be some confusion during this cross-over period as some of the shops have been selling off old stock.
I've now had both versions side by side to compare (Kathleen sent me samples of the old ones) - the ingredients are different and the textures are quite, quite different.
This is the state of play
Tubotica is now selling the NEW SPF50, but still the OLD SPF20
www.skincarecentral.biz is now selling the NEW SPF50, but the OLD SPF20 (sample sizes too)
http://www.monguidesante.com
is selling the NEW versions of both, but it's slow, they take at least 5 days to post the stuff.
The SPF 20 is virtually matt, virtually colour free; I'm using it on my neck and ears!! because my hair doesn't get stuck in it.
The SPF 50 has marginally more sheen, colour but again sheer, sheer, sheer. I can't use mineral SS because of colour issues (I'm medium toned) but this just gives a hint of evening and actually makes me look better.
It washes off really easily and it *improves* the moisture balance of your skin with daily use. The only negative I can find is that I can't use it on my inner eye area - the sebum regulating ingredient makes them water.
I love, love, love it. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sun Jun 10, 2007 2:48 am |
| avalange wrote: |
I'm pretty sure I'm using the latest formula... Yours has curcurbita extract, too? I tried three different kinds and absolutely cannot wear any of them! Ah well, to each her own...
--avalange |
Avalange
I'm hoping you have got the old version by accident. If it doesn't suit you, which is of course possible, then I'm afraid you're missing out on a treat IMHO.
The previous versions also had the curcurbita extract so that's no indication.
I've previously used the Lait, the creams, the sprays and the two previous versions of the emulsions 20 and 50.
These are definitely and radically different to anything I previously tried (except the old SPF20 emulsion which was also very sheer).I find pores on nose which could get cloggy with the other versions are now refined.
As you know I've tried almost every other; Sofina, Bioderma, Sunkiller, Vichy, Clarins etc and this is the best yet. It's also Kathleen's (formerly of theskincareboard now skincarecentral) new HG (unlike me she is acne prone) and she's tried 'em all and hated the previous Avenes.
Here's the packshot
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:26 pm |
| My own experience so far using the Boots Soltan SPF50 sunscreen compared to old formulation of Avene Emulsion SPF50. The Boots one has a nicer finish, more cosmetically elegant and gives face a bit of radiance. And it doesn't feel so heavy on the skin as the Avene emulsion. But it stings my eyes a bit, especially after a few hours. I don't get any irritation of my eyes at all with the Avene emulsion. You have to be careful not to get the Boots sunscreen to near the eyes when you're applying. Both protect well from the tropical sun. |
|
|
|
|
| Thu Jan 23, 2025 3:55 am |
If this is your first visit to the EDS Forums please take the time to register. Registration is required for you to post on the forums. Registration will also give you the ability to track messages of interest, send private messages to other users, participate in Gift Certificates draws and enjoy automatic discounts for shopping at our online store. Registration is free and takes just a few seconds to complete.
Click Here to join our community.
If you are already a registered member on the forums, please login to gain full access to the site. |
|
 |
|
|
