| Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Fri Mar 03, 2006 4:51 am  |
| I can“t figure out which would be best for my acne prone, combo-dry skin? |
|
|
Mabsy
Moderator
 
Joined: 17 Aug 2003
Posts: 9644
|
|
|
Fri Mar 03, 2006 6:36 am |
From memory, CSRx has the more substantial texture. Out of those two I would go with the PSF for my normal sometimes combo skin - but that is based purely on the texture of it and how it feels on my skin. The good news is that both are very stable  |
_________________
45, NW20, combination skin |
|
|
|
|
Fri Mar 03, 2006 6:52 am |
I have normal/dry skin and love the CSRX C+firming. I have used other C serums that were too drying for me. Haven't tried the PSF one though, but think it might suit your skin type more.
Lori |
_________________
Normal/Dry~slightly sensitive~usually clear~fine lines on forehead and neck~Age 36 |
|
|
|
|
Fri Mar 03, 2006 4:30 pm |
| I have combination skin and I found the PSF vit. C serum too shiny on my skin, due to the glycerine content. Now I know to avoid serums with glycerine in them. |
|
|
|
|
|
Fri Mar 03, 2006 5:44 pm |
Mabsy put these in a list of most watery to least watery in a recent thread.
| Quote: |
| ...if you have oily skin then chances are that you might prefer a more watery serum. IN that case Skinceuticals C serum, IS Clinical, and maybe PSF Skincare or Vivier. |
I agree with PocoLoco. I used to use the SkinCeuticals and liked it but it was so expensive that I switched to PSF. I noticed that I have to use less now or I will break out, so don't think I'll be going with Vivier unless it doesn't contain the glycerin. I have seriously been considering the CellularRx brand. Does anyone know where to place this in our "lineup"? |
|
|
|
|
|
Fri Mar 03, 2006 6:42 pm |
My favorite vit C serum is Vivant Spintrap. It's 15% L-ascorbic acid, plus the spintrap antioxidant. Very nice texture...not too watery, no glycerin, no sting.  You can buy it atwww.betterhealthyskin.com orwww.dianayvonne.com (but you have to send these folks an email and ask for it, as it's listed on their "private skin care board.") |
|
|
Mabsy
Moderator
Joined: 17 Aug 2003
Posts: 9644
|
|
|
Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:23 pm |
| pnw wrote: |
| I agree with PocoLoco. I used to use the SkinCeuticals and liked it but it was so expensive that I switched to PSF. I noticed that I have to use less now or I will break out, so don't think I'll be going with Vivier unless it doesn't contain the glycerin. I have seriously been considering the CellularRx brand. Does anyone know where to place this in our "lineup"? |
The CSRx serum is the most "substantial" of the listed ones - so to the right of Vivier on that list. HTH |
_________________
45, NW20, combination skin |
|
|
|
|
Fri Mar 03, 2006 9:35 pm |
Thanks, Mabsy.
If I was going to go "to the right" of PSF it would have to not contain glycerin. I don't mind if it is more substantial. Anyone else here who is acne prone with dry skin who is using and liking Vivier or CellularSkinRx? Please join us. |
|
|
Mabsy
Moderator
Joined: 17 Aug 2003
Posts: 9644
|
|
|
Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:54 am |
| pnw wrote: |
| If I was going to go "to the right" of PSF it would have to not contain glycerin. I don't mind if it is more substantial. Anyone else here who is acne prone with dry skin who is using and liking Vivier or CellularSkinRx? Please join us. |
I'm not 100% sure on this but I think Vivier is propylene glycol based and CSRx is butylene glycol (I don't know much about either for acne prone skin, sorry). To be honest, if I had acne prone skin I would be staying in that middle ground just to be safe... |
_________________
45, NW20, combination skin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sat Mar 04, 2006 12:40 pm |
| PocoLoco, what a cool site! I have experienced many of the unhappy red faces listed on this site, it is pretty right on. Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
Sat Mar 04, 2006 12:44 pm |
So, it seems there is still the unanswered question for Sharkbait as to which to choose - cellularRx or PSF.
What I understand so far is that cellularRx is more "substantial" in feel but not necessarily "greasier" ingredients wise than PSF, and that the PSF contains glycerin and two of us have experienced that as being too problematic for our acne prone skin.
Sharkbait, have you decided what to try? |
|
|
|
|
|
Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:43 pm |
I think I“ll go for the Cellular Rx to begin with. I can add it to my order here at EDS, and not many people seem to have had a problem with it. I“d love to try PSF, but samples aren“t available here in Scandinavia, so I might order a full size later.
Thanks for your help, all of you! |
|
|
Mabsy
Moderator
Joined: 17 Aug 2003
Posts: 9644
|
|
|
Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:34 pm |
| pnw wrote: |
| What I understand so far is that cellularRx is more "substantial" in feel but not necessarily "greasier" ingredients wise than PSF, and that the PSF contains glycerin and two of us have experienced that as being too problematic for our acne prone skin. |
The CSRx feels too oily on my skin. I know it's not oily itself but it feels like it so I call it "substantial" but I just don't like the texture for my normal-typed skin. I know others use it and have no problems so it is a perference issue. |
_________________
45, NW20, combination skin |
|
|
|
| Mon Sep 16, 2024 1:46 pm |
If this is your first visit to the EDS Forums please take the time to register. Registration is required for you to post on the forums. Registration will also give you the ability to track messages of interest, send private messages to other users, participate in Gift Certificates draws and enjoy automatic discounts for shopping at our online store. Registration is free and takes just a few seconds to complete.
Click Here to join our community.
If you are already a registered member on the forums, please login to gain full access to the site. |
|
 |
|
